Compare
Ujex Ingress vs Hookdeck
Quick verdict
Hookdeck: webhook development with excellent inspection, replay, filtering. Ujex Ingress: agent-aware tunnels with auth + audit + budget integration.
See the full deep-dive. Short version:
| Hookdeck | Ujex Ingress | |
|---|---|---|
| Local-dev tunnel | ✓ Excellent | ✓ |
| Stable URL custom domain | ✓ (paid) | ✓ (Stable tier) |
| Event inspection / replay | ✓ Best in class | Basic (audit log) |
| Auth via agent identity | API keys | Ujex device keys + scopes |
| Audit (hash-chained) | Standard logs | ✓ Hash-chained |
| Self-hostable | Cloud-managed | ✓ Apache-2.0 |
Pick Hookdeck if
- Webhook development tooling is the priority
- Standard webhook patterns (Stripe, GitHub) dominate your traffic
Pick Ujex Ingress if
- You're already on Ujex
- Agent identity authenticates inbound webhooks
- Self-hostable matters
FAQ
Does Hookdeck have an MCP server?
Yes — Hookdeck CLI ships MCP server capabilities.